Since contracts concern voluntary obligations, courts apply a number of safeguards to ensure that only those who give informed and genuine consent are legally bound. Prior to 1875, common law courts allowed the evasion of an agreement and damages only if a person was led to enter into an agreement by fraud, was subjected to physical coercion, or suffered from a lack of legal capacity. However, the courts have been much more generous because they have “rejected” (i.e., termination of a contract allowed when a person was the victim of misrepresentation, including of an innocent person, and “unconscionable influence” that went beyond the influence of physical threats. [271] In these situations, the victim of the misrepresentation or ruthless behaviour has the opportunity to circumvent the contract. If they are avoided, both parties have the right to have returned the property they had already transferred, so that no one remains unjustly enriched (although this terminology was only used in the twentieth century). During the twentieth century, the courts and the law expanded the range of circumstances in which a person could claim damages for negligent misrepresentation in addition to fraud. [272] As concerns aed grew about the use of unfair terms, calls were made to recognize a positive duty of the parties to disclose essential facts as part of a broader duty of “good faith” and some judges attempted to follow the U.S. Commercial Code by developing a broader doctrine of “unscrupulous” negotiations due to unequal bargaining power. However, this development was halted by the House of Lords, so that the problems of unfair contract terms continued to be addressed through targeted legislation. Courts also declare contracts invalid if they were for illegal purposes and refuse to enforce the agreement or give a remedy if it forced a person to rely on his or her illegal act. An exception to the law on misplaced allegations – that contracts are questionable, but that the right of withdrawal can be excluded, among other things, by the intervention of third-party rights – occurs when someone is led to conclude an agreement by a written document at a distance (and not in the case of a face-to-face transaction). . .
.
